So about this missionary who died as he tried to preach the Gospel on the North Sentinel Island.
I see some calling him a martyr and a hero of faith.
I see others calling him a dangerous colonizer.
Personally, I can’t fully side with either camp.
My impression of this guy, John Allen Chau, had good intentions and genuinely loved and cared for the Sentinelese people. Ed Stetzer, executive director of the Billy Graham Center, writes in the Washington Post:
Chau’s intent – according to others I’ve spoken with who knew him, went to school with him and helped him prepare – was to live among the North Sentinelese, learn their language, attend to their physical needs and then seek to share his faith with them.
Still, the way he illegally approached them was dangerous due to him possibly bringing diseases that they don’t have immunity against.
Continue reading Martyr or Colonialist? It’s Not That Simple
by Hadje C. Sadje.
“Sociologically, (Pentecostalism) it was a religion of the poor, marginalized, and dispossessed, who had little interest in matters of theology or church politics.” – Alister McGrath, Christianity’s Dangerous Idea (2007): 436-437.
Notably without a question mark, the quotation above expresses the truth about Filipino Pentecostal/Charismatic movements are more attractive to poor and marginalized. According to Julie C. Ma and Wonsuk Ma (2010), a Korean couple who spent the 13 years working as missionaries in the Philippines, argue that such daily struggle has made Filipino people turn to religions which promise divine answers, and Pentecostal-Charismatic Christianity has presented the most attractive message. For instance, they both describe that the nine-million strong El Shaddai Catholic Charismatic group in the Philippines exemplifies the flight of poverty-stricken masses to the miracle-performing God (p. 239). Continue reading Reinventing Pentecostal Prophetic Ministry in the Philippines
by Faith Totushek.
Frequently Jezebel is a label that many Christian women receive if they believe in the full equality of men and women in the home and church or if they consider themselves Christian Feminists. Both feminism and egalitarianism are labels that are vastly misunderstood in the church and have had their meanings co opted by opponents who define them as in some sense women who are out for power over men, unwilling to submit to authority, men haters and those who would support abortion. In reality this is not true. These are myths.
1. Are feminists and egalitarians out for power over men?
Often I hear feminists and egalitarians described as those who have a Jezebel Spirit. The Jezebel Spirit is described as someone who seeks control over passive men who are unable to speak up for themselves and are seduced by women to give over control of their lives. Such women are considered dangerous to the church and home. In reality, as women and men develop emotional and spiritual maturity, they begin to have stronger voices and a stronger sense of identity. This kind of growth leads to an ability to say what one believes and ask for what one needs as well as the ability to differentiate oneself from the self of others. If an individual does not have a strong sense of self they will often process a request as someone trying to control them. It has nothing to do with power over and everything to do with asking for what one wants or needs. Often the Jezebel label is given to any woman who is merely seeking to have a share in decision making or wishes to serve in an area that is most often dominated by men. To aspire to be a pastor or a leader can bring the label Jezebel to many.
Continue reading 4 Common Myths About Christian Feminists and Egalitarians