Why Did Jesus Tell His Disciples to Buy Swords?

Why did Jesus command his disciples to buy swords in Luke 22:38?

Now, however,” He told them, “the one with a purse should take it, and likewise a bag; and the one without a sword should sell his cloak and buy one. For I tell you that this Scripture must be fulfilled in Me: ‘And He was numbered with the transgressors.’ For what is written about Me is reaching its fulfillment.”

So they said, “Look, Lord, here are two swords.”

“That is enough,” He answered. (Lk 22:36-38)

A lot of people assume that it was in order to defend themselves, and use this as an argument for warfare and liberal gun laws. But if it’s one thing we can be sure of, it is that Jesus definitely didn’t intend the swords to be used for self-defense.

See, when a disciple (according to the Gospel of John, it was Peter) later uses one of these very swords for self-defense, Jesus rebukes him:

When Jesus’ followers saw what was going to happen, they said, “Lord, should we strike with our swords?” And one of them struck the servant of the high priest, cutting off his right ear.

But Jesus answered, “No more of this!” And he touched the man’s ear and healed him. (vv. 49-51)

I bet Peter was quite surprised by this. The very reason he struck the ear was that it would fall off, and now Jesus insists on putting it on again!

According to Matthew, Jesus pointed out to Peter that he doesn’t need violence to be protected:

“Put your sword back in its place,” Jesus said to him, “for all who draw the sword will die by the sword. Do you think I cannot call on my Father, and he will at once put at my disposal more than twelve legions of angels? But how then would the Scriptures be fulfilled that say it must happen in this way?” (Mt 26:52-54)

When the Savior later met with Pontius Pilate, he pointed out that his disciples wouldn’t fight because of the nature of his Kingdom:

“My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish leaders. But now my kingdom is from another place.” (Jn 18:26)

Some have suggested that while Jesus didn’t want his disciples to use the swords in order to stop his arrest, he did want them to use them for self-defense later. But this is not supported by the text.

Jesus says that two swords are “enough”, which doesn’t make much sense if these swords are supposed to protect all eleven apostles or even the whole church (which in a few weeks’ time would encompass over 3000 people). Furthermore, These swords, or any other swords, never show up again in the forthcoming narrative. Luke also wrote the book of Acts, and the only swords there are used to persecute and kill Christians (like James in chapter 12).

If the disciples had been armed, they would had at least tried to kill persecutors like Paul. Instead, it seems like they loved their enemies and turned the other cheek, allowing Paul to be converted by a supernatural vision instead.

Also, note that Jesus told his disciples in Lk 22:36 that it was so vital that they had swords that they sold their cloaks to get one. This clearly expresses urgency and importance. The cloak was among the last thing one sold in Biblical times, especially travellers were very vulnerable without cloaks. Jesus isn’t expressing long-term usage of swords, but that they immediately need them around.

But why?

If there’s nothing in the text that supports the idea that the swords were used for self-defense, what were they used for? There are a number of alternatives. Some have argued that Jesus spoke about spiritual, metaphorical swords, that they would get ready for spiritual battle. When they mistook him to speak about literal swords, he cuts them off, and later rebukes them when they use literal swords for self-defense.

Another similar theory is that he knew that they would take him to mean literal swords, and so he let them act out on their mistake so that they would learn that spiritual swords are the only ones that matter.

Personally, I don’t think Jesus talked about spiritual swords. But I don’t think he wanted literal swords to be used violently, either. Pay attention to the motivation he gives when he has just commanded the disciples to buy swords:

For I tell you that this Scripture must be fulfilled in Me: ‘And He was numbered with the transgressors.’ For what is written about Me is reaching its fulfillment.

This quote from Isiah is the key to this text. Jesus would be numbered with transgressors. That’s why he wants the disciples to buy swords. I believe he plays prophetic theater, just like he does when he rides a donkey into Jerusalem or when he picks twelve apostles. He fulfills and reinforces prophecy not just in his words, but in his actions.

You may have another theory on why Jesus gave this command, and that’s perfectly OK. But I hope I have shown you that the theory of self-defense doesn’t match with this narrative: it’s a modern idea that the biblical text doesn’t support.

Micael Grenholm is a Swedish pastor, author and editor for PCPJ.

ska%cc%88rmavbild-2017-01-06-kl-21-17-02Pentecostals & Charismatics for Peace & Justice is a multicultural, gender inclusive, and ecumenical organization that promotes peace, justice, and reconciliation work among Pentecostal and Charismatic Christians around the world. If you like what we do, please become a member!

10 thoughts on “Why Did Jesus Tell His Disciples to Buy Swords?”

  1. Jesus rebuked Peter for striking with the sword, because Peter was acting in defense of Jesus. There is no need to protect Jesus – anything would only happen to Jesus if He would allow it. This does not reflect on a mortal person or follow defending themselves or other innocent life. We have that responsibility.

    Like

    1. I see what you mean. However, when Jesus rebukes him he seems to point to a universal principle of not using swords (Matthew 26:52). We see no swords being used by Christians in Acts, even when the church is persecuted. And the crucial question is of course if we really love our enemies and turn the other cheeks when we try to kill others?

      Blessings!

      Like

      1. Uh, no. He tells Peter to put his sword, “in it’s place”. He does not say to rid of it.

        Like

      2. And turning the other cheek is not a passive affair at all. When the other cheek is turned, the assailant would find it necessary to strike the other cheek with the open hand, as opposed to the back of the hand as on the prior strike. To use the open side of the hand was a punishable criminal offense against another citizen and would subject him to punishment.

        Same goes for a Roman soldier to order someone to run further than a mile, that would be against the law and subject the soldier to punishment.

        If you gave your cloak, you would be NAKED! In the days of scripture, it was not a disgrace to be seen naked, but on the contrary the disgrace was upon the OBSERVER of the nakedness! As such the shame of Ham when he saw his father’s nakedness as he was naked in his tent.

        Like

      3. This quote from Isiah is the key to this text. Jesus would be numbered with transgressors. That’s why he wants the disciples to buy swords. I believe he plays prophetic theater, just like he does when he rides a donkey into Jerusalem or when he picks twelve apostles. He fulfills and reinforces prophecy not just in his words, but in his actions.

        What does having a sword have to do with Jesus being numbered with transgressors,,,,unless it was illegal to have sword,,,but then you did not explain that. Which way is it?

        Like

      4. Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
        Thy sword into his place – Into the sheath.
        For all they that take the sword … – This passage is capable of different significations.

        1. They who resist by the sword the civil magistrate shall be punished; and it is dangerous, therefore, to oppose those who come with the authority of the civil ruler.

        2. These men, Jews and Romans, who have taken the sword against the innocent, shall perish by the sword. God will take vengeance on them.

        3. However, the most satisfactory interpretation is that which regards it as a caution to Peter. Peter was rash. Alone he had attacked the whole band. Jesus told him that his unseasonable and imprudent defense might be the occasion of his own destruction. In doing it he would endanger his life, for they who took the sword perished by it. This was probably a proverb, denoting that they who engaged in wars commonly perished there.

        Like

  2. Jesus instructs His disciples to not use swords as He sends them out to proclaim the Gospel.

    This statement does not apply to other possible life events. We are to protect innocent life. In the process of protecting innocence, death might be an unintended consequence of whatever level of force was required to stop the offensive action.

    Like

  3. Yep, funny how Jesus can clearly reference defending yourself as normal and expected but gun grabbers still seek to deceive….

    Like

Leave a Reply to Chuck Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s